مؤطا امام مالک - کتاب حکموں کی - حدیث نمبر 1313
عَنْ جَمِيلِ بْنِ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ الْمُؤَذِّنِ أَنَّهُ کَانَ يَحْضُرُ عُمَرَ بْنَ عَبْدِ الْعَزِيزِ وَهُوَ يَقْضِي بَيْنَ النَّاسِ فَإِذَا جَائَهُ الرَّجُلُ يَدَّعِي عَلَی الرَّجُلِ حَقًّا نَظَرَ فَإِنْ کَانَتْ بَيْنَهُمَا مُخَالَطَةٌ أَوْ مُلَابَسَةٌ أَحْلَفَ الَّذِي ادُّعِيَ عَلَيْهِ وَإِنْ لَمْ يَکُنْ شَيْئٌ مِنْ ذَلِکَ لَمْ يُحَلِّفْهُ
دعوے کے فیصلے کا بیان
جمیل بن عبدالرحمن عمر بن عبدالعزیز کے پاس آیا کرتے تھے جب وہ فیصلہ کرتے تھے لوگوں کا جو شخص کسی پر دعوی کرے گو مدعی اور مدعا علیہ میں یک جائی اور تعلق اور تباط معلوم ہوتا تو مدعا علیہ سے حلف لیتے ورنہ حلف نہ لیتے۔
Yahya said, "Malik said about Jamil ibn Abd ar-Rahman al-Muadhdin that he was present with Umar ibn Abdul Aziz when he was judging between people. If a man came to him with a claim against a man, he examined whether or not there were frequent transactions and dealings between them. If there were, the defendant could make an oath. If there was nothing of that nature he did not accept an oath from him." Malik summed up, "What is done in our community is that if some one makes a claim against a man, it is examined. If there are frequent transactions and dealings between them, the defendant is made to take an oath. If he takes an oath, the claim against him is dropped. If the defendant refuses to take an oath, and returns the oath to the claimant, the one claiming his right takes an oath and takes his due."
Top